Women in architecture

Architecture is traditionally a male-dominated business. Real estate is the same. Investors of note like David Lichtenstein encourage the role of women in both architecture and real estate and it looks as if things are really beginning to change.

Women are generally on the up in the architectural world. They’re still to achieve a completely equal footing but the role of women in building beautiful buildings is absolutely nothing new. In America in the 19th century, for example, it was commonplace for women to design and commission their own homes to exacting specifications.

And the famous Frank Lloyd Wright’s first ever employee was a woman who in turn became the world’s first woman to be licensed as a practicing architect. Called Marion Mahony Griffin, she contributed hugely both to Frank Lloyd Wright’s ‘s career and  to the career of her husband, Walter Burley Griffin, the American architect and landscaper best known for his role in designing Canberra, Australia’s capital city.

More recently, the Japanese female architect Kazuyo Sejima launched a Tokyo-based firm that designed award-winning buildings around the world.

In fact, she and her partner, Ryue Nishizawa, shared the 2010 Pritzker Prize for Architecture.

The first ever female winner of the prize, though, was Baghdad-born (in 1950) Zaha Hadid. Her work in new spatial concepts encompassing all fields of design from urban spaces and buildings to products and furniture deservedly earned her the honour.

And finally, what about, Maya Lin (born in October 1959) who is perhaps best known for her large, minimalist sculptures and monuments? When she was just 21 years of age and still just a student, Lin created the winning design for the Vietnam Veterans’ Memorial in Washington, DC.

Women bring something to the world of architecture that men don’t. This may be a sweeping generalisation, but it’s also very true.

Modern architecture

Modern architecture is noticeably different to something that would have been produced several hundred years ago. These days there is a real emphasis on lines, either horizontal or vertical or both. Architects now produce buildings that are fairly simple on the eye and they do not involve any unnecessary detail. Some would say these changes came about through social and political changes. Others would argue it had a lot more to do with the wider variety of building materials that became available. Either way modern architects are designing buildings with far more things in mind, natural disasters and terrorist attacks, for them this may be more important than unnecessary detail. [Read more...]

What is Architecture?

The term architecture can be related to the erection of buildings. There are so many different parts to this process and they would all be deemed architecture. From the very first plans for a building (which would be modified many times) to the physical act of putting the building together – it is all architecture. The term architecture would also be applied to the erection of any structure. Architecture requires an element of creativity with the technical knowledge to make sure a design will really be a success. An architect that is working in a capital city of a country will more than likely design a new building that will reflect something from the cities culture. A successful architect from history will be identified by the buildings/structures of theirs that are still standing. Looking back in time to the creation of the pyramids in Egypt- this allows us to see something of the mindset of the architects of the day. Of course the pyramids have been there through generations. It is unlikely a modern day architect would design something like the pyramids now. We can see how an architect was thinking by looking at one of their creations.

Some buildings are like a snapshot of the time they were built in. The architect helps establish this and it can become a part of the cultures history. Some concepts that architect have developed have been controversial. The idea of a ‘high rise’ building took the idea of a street and turns upwards so meaning it would still have the community feel to it but it using less land to build. This did not work in every area and circumstance and actually some these buildings became havens for crime and vandalism. So in theory it is a good idea but it did not really work out in the way it was intended. The point being architects have a massive responsibility. Buildings cannot just be torn down if it does not work out. They cost such a lot to construct then there is all the noise and inconvenience of having large machinery in and out of residential areas that they cannot afford to get it wrong.